Families First
About This Program
Target Population: Families and referred children who are at-risk as a result of family conflict, lack of parenting skills, child abuse, childhood emotional issues, disruptive behavioral problems including criminal misconduct and other at-risk situations children, parents, and families face.
For children/adolescents ages: 0 – 17
For parents/caregivers of children ages: 0 – 17
Program Overview
The Families First program utilizes the Risk, Need, and Responsivity Model for intervention with at-risk youth and families through 3-4 home visits per week totaling 6-10 hours per week, typically lasting 10-12 weeks. Individual responsivity factors are assessed so the worker can tailor the intervention to the youth and family. While the youth's specific risk factors are targeted, the risk factors related to the home environment (e.g., parental relationships, supervision, structure, discipline, etc.) and the social environment (e.g., peer associations, community involvement, relationships, etc.) are also targeted.
The specific implementation of the Families First program is carried out using a 6-phase model within the framework of the Teaching-Family Model. This treatment approach began in the 1960s at the University of Kansas. Its basis is in cognitive behavioral approaches, social learning theory, modeling, and a strength-based emphasis on actively teaching and role-playing skills that promote positive client and family outcomes.
Program Goals
The goals of the Families First program are:
- In home visits and skills will empower parents to be able to effectively intervene with their children using proven effective parenting techniques
- In home visits that actively teach children, parents, and families prosocial skills will promote long-term sustainable change
- Family relationships will improve through intensive in-home visits that will help decrease parent-child conflict
- As a result of the in-home intervention, risk factors associated with at-risk populations will be turned into protective factors
Logic Model
The program representative did not provide information about a Logic Model for Families First.
Essential Components
The essential components of the Families First program include:
- Program Introduction
- A family or professional working with a family identifies a need for in-home services to address child and adolescent behavioral problems.
- A referral form must be filled out and submitted prior to service beginning.
- The family will receive services if it does not fall under the following exclusionary criteria:
- A patient is actively substance/chemically dependent and requires detoxification.
- There is an active suicide risk or attempts that require hospitalization.
- There is active domestic violence which creates an unsafe environment for the in-home worker to be in.
- A referral specifically treating a clinical issue (i.e., depression, anxiety, etc.) is outstanding and the patient is not yet receiving treatment from a licensed clinician. (If the patient is in treatment as stated, then Families First is an appropriate behavioral in-home intervention.)
- Cases are staffed before assigning to determine the best fit with an in-home professional.
- The in-home professional should contact the family and referring worker within 48 hours and schedule an initial visit.
- The in-home professional administers a Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ-2.0).
- The in-home professional administers standardized responsivity assessment(s).
- The in-home professional identifies each family member's strengths and risk factors.
- The in-home professional begins building rapport and a positive relationship as well as praising strengths on which family members can build.
- The in-home professional fills out an assessment form to identify presenting problems, family and individual history, previous treatment, community resources, medication and allergies, and support system.
- Direct Service
- The in-home professional should visit the home 3 or more times a week, spending 8-10 hours each week, with frequency and duration decreasing based on skill acquisition.
- The in-home professional is on-call to the family 24/7 for crisis management.
- A 6-phase model is used:
- The first phase is focused on building rapport, exploring agenda, and identifying strengths and risk factors.
- The second and third phases focus on teaching specific skills that target the identified behavioral risk factors in a systematic manner, including the use of role plays, modeling, constructive feedback, and specific assignments to increase the understanding and use of the new skills taught.
- During Phase 4, the in-home professional works with the youth, their parent(s), and the family unit to refine the skills they have been taught so they can be used more consistently on a long-term basis without the in-home professional having to be present.
- In Phase 5, the in-home professional's focus is on helping generalize the skills taught to multiple situations. This process involves helping the youth, parent(s), and family identify specific problematic situations that may occur in the future and role playing how they would use the skills taught to them in those situations.
- The final sixth phase is focused on building the youth, parent(s), and family's belief in their ability to independently use the skills taught to them and help them identify the specific changes they have made and formalize their plans for the future.
- Each phase has individual completion criteria requiring specific documentation of the reduction of identified disruptive behavioral risk factors and skill attainment.
- Follow-up services are initiated by the in-home professional at 30, 90, 180, and 360 days after completing the intervention, with the first follow-up being a face-to-face visit; the in-home professional remains on-call to the family 24/7 for this year.
- In-home professionals participate in a weekly staff meeting to receive related training and share staff successes as well as review difficult cases.
- In-home professionals attend weekly consultation with a direct supervisor to staff cases and review the Teaching-Family Model and implementation of phases.
- In-home professionals carry a small caseload of 2-4 families at a time.
- Case notes are completed after each visit and these notes are submitted as a service log weekly.
- Treatment and discharge plans are submitted within 10 days after starting or ending services with a family.
- Staff Characteristics
- In-home professionals must have a bachelor's degree in a related field.
- In-home professionals are then selected based on their personal characteristics (i.e., ability to establish rapport, non-judgmental, teaching abilities, self-motivated).
- All staff must participate in preservice training, training on the Teaching-Family Model, and phases manual training prior to working with families.
- All staff shadow 6 in-home professionals on in-home visits, shadow an experienced in-home professional for one full intervention, and complete a 50/50 family before fully trained.
- In-home professionals participate in at least 40 hours of additional job training yearly, in addition to preservice training.
- Full-time supervisors have 7-8 in-home professionals to supervise and oversee program fidelity.
Program Delivery
Child/Adolescent Services
Families First directly provides services to children/adolescents and addresses the following:
- Including, but not limited to:
- delinquent and disruptive behavior
- depression
- truancy
- drug and alcohol use
- running away
- school learning or misbehaviors
- suicide threats and ideation
- sexually reactive behaviors
- authority conflicts
- neglect or abuse
- hyperactivity
- physical and verbal aggression
- anger management
- poor decision-making
Parent/Caregiver Services
Families First directly provides services to parents/caregivers and addresses the following:
- Lack of parenting skills to address disruptive behavior, managing parent tolerance differences, family conflict, instability, appropriate child supervision and correction techniques
Services Involve Family/Support Structures:
This program involves the family or other support systems in the individual's treatment: All family members living at home will be included in learning and implementing skills addressing at-risk issues and will be given homework assignments to ensure implementation and skill use outside of Families First visits. Family members may also include any external party such as, grandparents, aunts and uncles, or other adults in the home, as long as they are willing and the client desires their participation. They will be taught the same skills as the in-home family members and the In-home professionals will follow-up on their skill acquisition
Recommended Intensity:
3-4 in-home visits per week lasting 6-10 hours per week.
Recommended Duration:
Typically lasts 8-12 weeks based on the progress of skill acquisition and phase completion.
Delivery Settings
This program is typically conducted in a(n):
- Adoptive Home
- Birth Family Home
Homework
Families First includes a homework component:
Homework assignments are given as a means to bolster and practice the skill(s) being taught. This can be through worksheets, practicing skills after the in-home worker has left, reading assignments, and/or other similar assignments.
Languages
Families First has materials available in a language other than English:
Spanish
For information on which materials are available in this language, please check on the program's website or contact the program representative (contact information is listed at the bottom of this page).
Resources Needed to Run Program
The typical resources for implementing the program are:
Personnel costs; since the position is a telecommuting position in-home professionals will need access to a car, phone, and computer to complete paperwork; minimal office space for consultations and staff meetings.
Manuals and Training
Prerequisite/Minimum Provider Qualifications
A Bachelor's Degree in a related field
Manual Information
There is a manual that describes how to deliver this program.
Training Information
There is training available for this program.
Training Contact:
- Wayne Arner, LPC, Families First Program Director
phone: (801) 308-1052
Training Type/Location:
Locally at Utah Youth Village or at an on-site location
Number of days/hours:
Approximately 4 days at 25 hours; this doesn't include shadow visits, which are included for training at Utah Youth Village
Additional Resources:
There currently are additional qualified resources for training:
For the Teaching-Family Model part of the training - Teaching-Family Association: www.teaching-family.org
Implementation Information
Pre-Implementation Materials
There are no pre-implementation materials to measure organizational or provider readiness for Families First.
Formal Support for Implementation
There is formal support available for implementation of Families First as listed below:
Following the formal onsite training, ongoing consultation/coaching is available for further implementation.
Fidelity Measures
There are fidelity measures for Families First as listed below:
Fidelity measures to ensure the components of the Families First program are implemented have been developed. These are completed through direct in-home observations by supervisors. They are not publicly available.
Implementation Guides or Manuals
There are implementation guides or manuals for Families First as listed below:
There is a detailed training manual for implementing the Families First program along with other educational training materials. It is not publicly available.
Research on How to Implement the Program
Research has not been conducted on how to implement Families First.
Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research
Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being
Lewis, R. E. (2005). The effectiveness of Families First services: An experimental study. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.10.009
Type of Study:
Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants:
150
Population:
- Age — 3.9 to 17.3 years (Average age=10.4 years)
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — 75% Male and 25% Female
- Status — Participants were children identified by school or the juvenile court as having serious problems in functioning.
Location/Institution: Utah Youth Village
Summary:
(To include basic study design, measures, results, and notable limitations)
The purpose of the study was to examine the Families First intervention for helping families overcome serious problems in child behavior and child management. Participants were randomly assigned to Families First or a control group. Measures utilized include a 63-item questionnaire developed specifically for the study. Results indicate that families receiving Families First, reported significant improvement in child behavior, physical care and resources, parental effectiveness, and parent–child relationships, when compared with families in the control group. Limitations include the reliance on self-reported measures, the use of study-developed measures, and that findings were based on parent perceptions.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 3 months.
Hess, J. Z., Arner, W., Skyes, E., Price, A. G., & Tanana, M. (2012). Helping juvenile offenders on their own turf: Tracking the recidivism outcomes of a home-based intervention. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 2(1) 12–24. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles/240461.pdf#page=18
Type of Study:
Pretest–posttest study with a nonequivalent control group (Quasi-experimental)
Number of Participants:
Intervention=154; Control=3064
Population:
- Age — 12–17 years
- Race/Ethnicity — 48% Caucasian, 36% Latino, 4% African American, 4% Pacific Islander, 2% American Indian, and 2% Asian
- Gender — 79% Male
- Status — Participants were youth enrolled in the Families First program.
Location/Institution: Utah Youth Village
Summary:
(To include basic study design, measures, results, and notable limitations)
The purpose of the study was to examine the efficacy of the Utah Youth Village's Families First program. Participants were youth who enrolled in Families First compared to youth who had received similar sanctions from the juvenile court but were not referred to Families First. Measures utilized include administrative data regarding juvenile offenses from the juvenile justice system, the Protective and Risk Assessment, based on Washington State's Prescreen Risk Assessment, and several measures from the Communities that Care Survey. Results indicate that the Families First group has a significantly lower recidivism rate than the comparison group, based on a one-year follow-up of new misdemeanor or felony charges, as well as significant reductions in rebellious and anti-social attitudes. Limitations include a lack of randomization, no information is given on the differences, if any, between the intervention and control groups, and the comparison group was not matched to take into account other factors that may influence re-offense rate.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 12 months.
Tanana, M. J., & Kuo, P. B. (2023). A propensity score matched pair outcome evaluation of a parenting program for dually involved youth. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 17(5), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2022.2131028
Type of Study:
Pretest–posttest study with a nonequivalent control group (Quasi-experimental)
Number of Participants:
303
Population:
- Age — Mean=15.54–15.62 years
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — Not specified
- Status — Participants were youth enrolled in the Families First program.
Location/Institution: Utah Youth Village
Summary:
(To include basic study design, measures, results, and notable limitations)
The purpose of the study was to examine treatment outcomes of juveniles and families enrolled in the Families First program from 2007 to 2012 with a rigorous propensity score matched pair design. Participants were youth in Families First that were matched to a comparison sample of court supervised youth in the same time period using a propensity score-matched pair design. Measures utilized include administrative data that provided charges, convictions, placements and dispositions for juveniles from the State of Utah court data system. Results indicate that youth enrolled in Families First had significantly fewer misdemeanor and felony charges than youth in the comparison group 12 months after the start (54% less) and end (55% less) of the program. There were mixed findings for reductions in status and technical offenses. Limitations include the study did not examine potential mediators involved in treatment effects, did not assess effectiveness of Families First across specific racial-ethnic minority communities who are overrepresented in the child welfare system, and was not able to control or quantify the level of child welfare involvement of the youth due to limitations of the state court and child welfare data systems in providing this information.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 3 and 9 months.
Additional References
Hess, J. Z. (2010). Families First outcomes, 2004-2009. Jacob Hess: Utah Youth Village, Salt Lake City, UT. Copies available via email request: jhess@youthvillage.org
University of Utah Utah Criminal Justice Center. (2019). The evidence-based correctional program checklist (CPC 2.0). Salt Lake City, UT. Retrieved from https://youthvillage.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/FINAL-Statewide-Families-First-Report-2019.pdf
Gray, D. M. (n.d.) Utah youth suicide study: Evidence-based suicide prevention for juvenile offenders; University of Utah School of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry. University of Utah School of Medicine, Psychiatric Department. Salt Lake City, UT. Copies available via request by email: douglas.gray@hsc.utah.edu
Contact Information
- Wayne Arner, LPC
- Title: Families First Program Director
- Agency/Affiliation: Utah Youth Village
- Website: youthvillage.org/our-programs/families-first-home
- Email: warner@youthvillage.org
- Phone: (801) 308-1052
- Fax: (801) 272-9976
Date Research Evidence Last Reviewed by CEBC: April 2024
Date Program Content Last Reviewed by Program Staff: March 2020
Date Program Originally Loaded onto CEBC: September 2012