Porowski, A., & Passa, A. (2011).
The effect of Communities in Schools on high school dropout and graduation rates: Results from a multiyear, school-level quasi-experimental study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 16(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2011.545977
Type of Study:
Pretest–posttest study with a nonequivalent control group (Quasi-experimental)
Number of Participants:
246 schools
Population:
- Age — Not specified
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — Not specified
- Status — Participants were high schools that implemented the Communities in Schools program for at least 3 consecutive years.
Location/Institution:
Florida, Georgia, Texas, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington.
Summary:
(To include basic study design, measures, results, and notable limitations)
The purpose of the study was to examine the differences in high school dropout and graduation rates between Communities in Schools (CIS) and its comparison schools over a 4-year period, starting from the year prior to CIS implementation to 3 years after implementation. Participants were either CIS high schools or matched comparison high schools. Measures utilized include administrative data from the National Center for Education Statistics’ Common Core of Data and State Department of Education Web sites and offices. Results indicate that CIS high schools made stronger gains in on-time graduation rates, and had greater reductions in dropout rates, than comparison schools over the same period. Results were considerably stronger for CIS schools that implemented the CIS model with a high degree of fidelity. Limitations include propensity score matching is limited in its reliance on observed variables, the possibility that some unobservable factors (e.g., motivation to implement CIS within a school district) may account for at least part of the positive outcomes found in this study, and the sample size was limited because not all State Department of Education data could be aligned across all time points.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up:
None.