There are pre-implementation materials to measure organizational or provider readiness for GenerationPMTO (Individual Delivery Format) as listed below:

Readiness checklists are tailored for various types of implementations. Additionally, an FAQ document is available that assists interested organizations in determining if GenerationPMTO (Individual Delivery Format) is a good fit. Contact the Director of Administration, Anna Snider, for pre-implementation materials at (541) 485-2711 or annas@generationpmto.org.

There is formal support available for implementation of GenerationPMTO (Individual Delivery Format) as listed below:

Prior to the start of implementation, the ISII model developer team may conduct on-site visits with agency leaders and supervisors. These pre-implementation meetings are an opportunity for sites to describe their specific context, for model developers to provide information about GenerationPMTO's research basis, intervention components, training program, engagement strategies, to advise about requirements, for collaboration about short- and long-term goals, and to ensure readiness. Implementation Sciences International, Inc. (ISII), which is a non-profit affiliate of the Oregon Social Learning Center, oversees the implementation of GenerationPMTO. The Director of Implementation and Training designs the training programs and infrastructure protocol. They also provide training, coaching, and coordination for implementation projects. The director leads a team of trainers and consultants who are available to provide support for all implementation objectives. The ISII website (www.generationpmto.org) provides individual descriptions and roles for staff, mentors, and associates.

There are fidelity measures for GenerationPMTO (Individual Delivery Format) as listed below:

Competent adherence to GenerationPMTO is assessed with the Fidelity of Implementation Rating System (FIMP). The Director of Fidelity, oversees fidelity operations for GenerationPMTO implementation sites. FIMP ratings are made by reliable certified GenerationPMTO specialists who assess the intervention as delivered with individual families in community or home settings. Ratings are based on direct observation of segments of sessions based on core parenting components and evaluate five theoretically relevant categories (i.e., Knowledge, Structure, Teaching, Process Skills, and Overall Development). Procedures, definitions of core parenting practices, and the rating scale are described in the FIMP manual. Interested parties can contact the Director of Administration, Anna Snider, for the fidelity measure. She is available at (541) 485-2711 or annas@generationpmto.org.

There are implementation guides or manuals for GenerationPMTO (Individual Delivery Format) as listed below:

Manuals are required for implementation and are provided (at workshops) to those who receive training in GenerationPMTO. Additionally, manuals are provided to clinicians who participate in training to become GenerationPMTO Coaches and Trainers.

Research has been conducted on how to implement GenerationPMTO (Individual Delivery Format) as listed below:

• Akin, B. A., Testa, M. F., McDonald, T. P., Melz, H., Blase, K. A., & Barclay, A. (2014). Formative evaluation of an evidence-based intervention to reduce long-term foster care: Assessing readiness for summative evaluation. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 8, 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2014.939250
• Bryson, S. A., Akin, B. A., Blase, K. A., McDonald, T., & Walker, S. (2014). Selecting an EBP to reduce long-term foster care: Lessons from a university-child welfare agency partnership. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11, 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2013.850325
• Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2011). Sustaining fidelity following the nationwide PMTO implementation in Norway. Prevention Science, 12, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0225-6
• Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2013). Looking forward: The promise of widespread implementation of parent training programs. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613503478
• Hukkelberg, S., & Ogden, T. (2013). Working alliance and treatment fidelity as predictors of externalizing problem behaviors in Parent Management Training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 1010–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033825
• Ogden, T., Bjornebekk, G., Kjobli, J., Patras, J., Christiansen, T., Taraldsen, K., & Tollefsen, N. (2012). Measurement of implementation components ten years after a nationwide introduction of empirically supported programs-a pilot study. Implementation Science, 7(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-49
• Tommeraas, T., & Ogden, T. (2017). Is there a scale-up penalty? Testing behavioral change in the scaling up of Parent Management Training in Norway. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0712-3